How Sad a Passage

COUNTESS "This young gentlewoman had a father,--O, that 'had'! how sad a passage 'tis!--whose skill was almost as great as his honesty; had it stretched so far, would have made nature immortal, and death should have play for lack of work." -Act I scene i, All's Well that Ends Well.

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

God has added joy to my life

If that is the meaning, wow, and why not?  Need to sign the contract and win the league then we can discuss seriously.  And if there is no Briar after all, then all is moot.  Only a few days left until the snip, done before this run is carried out to the natural conclusion, but faith is the power to hear, etc. etc.  The mama is down so I am too, and timing is ironic in advance of Easter and London so soon come and all of that.

Our #1 son really is a wonder.  Adorable AA.  Long may it be so.  So much to look forward to through his eyes, and hard to fully capture the gift of seeing it up close every day, but having the chance to step away and work on intellectual matters to support it all.

Took possession of this place on this eve last year, and no regrets.  The neighbourhood and surroundings a blessing, and though the hot tub and mini-wharf have not yet been enjoyed, 'twill serve in the end, I have no doubt.  There must be some direction, and part of the lesson must be in learning that these financial litigation matters are not to be concerning.  A classic series of emails tonight, nonetheless, as DM says.  Let me leave this here, a guy fighting his own health issues and still cares passionately about what is right in his small corner of the world... long may the memory hold.

I approve, with these comments. I believe that the Tariffs mean exactly what they say, and NSP should be sanctioned for constructing interpretations not supported by the language.  Willis' "plain reading" interpretation. Other parties do not have NSP's comparatively infinite resources to litigate and that fact should be raised; that's part of what the exercise of what market power means in a regulated monopoly context.  Also, there is no "competitive market" in BU capacity and energy, and perhaps the Board should be reminded of that fact.  Remember the NSDRR will read this filing. If there were a competitive market for that supply NSP would be our last choice for service, since dealing with an entity dedicated to bad faith  is difficult and expensive.  I believe we have nothing to lose by being explicit in our response to the Board and naming NSP's duplicity and exercise of market exactly as that.  BW's good opinion is worthless to us; I don't care if we stray beyond politesse in this, the fiction that NSP acts in good faith should be exposed.

 

Next time I'm going to say what I really think.

 

Many thanks, DRpower 



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home